Language, Power, and Crime: A Discourse Analysis of Murder Reporting in Kenyan Newspapers

Authors

  • Elizabeth Khaemba Ph. D. Candidate, MOI University, Kenya
  • Dr. Nganga Senior Lecturer, Moi University, Kenya
  • Dr. Onyiego Senior Lecturer, Moi University, Kenya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61320/jolcc.v4i1.123-139

Keywords:

Critical Linguistics; inequalities; linguistic strategies; murder reporting; power dynamics.

Abstract

This paper explores the linguistic strategies used by journalists in reporting murders implicating prominent personalities. Notably, it examines how these strategies are employed to construct the perpetrators’ identities, underscoring how journalists navigate the power dynamics inherent in such stories while managing potential harm to themselves, the subjects involved, and the broader sociopolitical context. The critical role of language in shaping public discourse on justice is also examined. Utilizing ten purposively sampled headlines and leads from The Daily Nation and The Standard newspapers’ 2018 coverage of murders implicating prominent figures in Kenya, a qualitative investigation reveals how journalists negotiate power asymmetries and the implications of this navigation for both their safety and public perceptions of justice. Guided by Roger Fowler’s Critical Linguistics (1970), the findings indicate that journalists employ nominal references and transitivity choices differently, depending on the subject’s status and the media outlet. There’s a notable tendency for the Daily Nation to use both nominal references and transitivity to implicate suspects, thereby emphasizing accusation and implicitly reinforcing a narrative of guilt. Conversely, The Standard’s use of similar strategies tends to deflect blame, offering protection to suspects. These divergent patterns raise essential questions about media framing, power asymmetries in crime reporting, and highlight the need for policy and advocacy efforts to foster ethical and balanced journalism. Recommendations include investigating digital and audio media, as well as cases involving less powerful individuals, to deepen our understanding of how language mediates issues of justice and inequality across various platforms.

References

Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. Continuum.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. Edward Arnold.

Fairclough, N. (2003). Discourse and power. Pearson Education.

Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. Routledge.

Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G., & Trew, T. (1979). Language and control. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Greenbaum, S., & Nelson, G. (2009). An introduction to English grammar (2nd ed.). Pearson.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar (1st ed.). Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1985). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.

Mammadov, A., & Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (Eds.). (2022). Analysing media discourse: Traditional and new. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

National Crime Research Centre. (2021). Public perceptions and experiences on the loss of criminal cases in law courts by the Government of Kenya. Government of Kenya. https://www.crimeresearch.go.ke/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Report-on-Why- Government-Losses-Criminal-Cases.pdf

Petintseva, O. (2022). Language matters: Doing systematic (critical) discourse analysis. In M. R. McGuire & A. M. L. McGuire (Eds.), Qualitative research in criminology (pp. 199– 210). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18401-7_12

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE.

Reah, D. (1998). The language of newspapers. Routledge.

Simpson, P., & Mayr, A. (2010). Language and power: A resource book for students (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Tabbert, U. (2016). Crime and corpus: The linguistic representation of crime in the press. John Benjamins.

Tatton, S. (2023). Whose take is the take? The contemporary framing of intimate partner a buse in news reports on the murder of Hannah Clarke. In International Perspectives on Gender-Based Violence (pp. 179–192). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3- 031-42867-8_11

Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. SAGE Publications.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as discourse. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Vaughan, C. (2022). Australian media messages: Critical discourse analysis of two intimate homicides involving domestic violence. Violence Against Women. https://www.academia.edu/90005664/Australian_Media_Messages_Critical_Discourse_Analysis_of_Two_Intimate_Homicides_Involving_Domestic_Violence

Downloads

Published

2026-05-10

How to Cite

Khaemba, E., Nganga, S., & Onyiego, S. (2026). Language, Power, and Crime: A Discourse Analysis of Murder Reporting in Kenyan Newspapers. Journal of Linguistics, Culture and Communication, 4(1), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.61320/jolcc.v4i1.123-139

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.