“WHO am I?”: A Comparative Metadiscourse Analysis of Identity and Self-construction on LinkedIn Profiles and X Bios
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61320/jolcc.v3i1.120-150Keywords:
Metadiscourse, Self-Construction, Identity, Metadiscourse markersAbstract
This research presents a comparative metadiscourse analysis of LinkedIn profiles and X bios for Identity and Self-construction. The study identifies the various metadiscourse features employed in LinkedIn profiles and X bios, categorizes the features, and also discusses how the identified features are used to construct professional and personal identities on LinkedIn and X. The study unveils how individuals strategically construct identities for themselves and establish connections, through linguistic and rhetorical strategies. The research qualitatively analyzes 60 accounts each on LinkedIn and X. Hyland’s (2005) Metadiscourse theory is adopted as the framework for the study. The data findings reveal differences in language use, self-presentation strategies, and how users establish their personal or professional identity and presence on both online platforms. It also reveals that X bios emphasize creativity, humor, and personal interests. In contrast, LinkedIn profiles prioritize professionalism, accomplishments, and career-related information. The study concludes that a comparative metadiscourse analysis of LinkedIn profiles and X bios reveals a distinct use of metadiscourse markers for identity and self-construction, highlighting how individuals tailor their self-presentation toward the platform's conventions and purposes. This highlights the dynamic nature of self-presentation in the digital age.
References
Abdullah, N. ; Rahmat, N. & Fatin Zafirah Zawawi, F. (2020). Interactional Discourse Analysis of Malaysian and South Korean Newspaper Articles on Online Learning during Covid-19. European Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies, 3(1), 1-16
Al-Subhi, A. (2022) . Metadiscourse in online advertising: Exploring linguistic and visual metadiscourse in social media advertisements, Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 187, pp. 24-40
Anuarsham, A.; Rahmati, N. & Khamsah, M. (2020). Metadiscourse Analysis of an Online Entertainment Article. European Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies, 3(1), 17-29.
Crismore, A. (1989). Talking with readers: metadiscourse as rhetorical act. New York: Peter Lang.
Etemadfar, P. (2020). An Investigation of Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers as Persuasive strategies in Donald Trump’s 2016 Campaign Speeches. Critical Literary Studies, 2(2), 117-130.
Farahani, M. (2018). The Usage and Distributional Pattern of Metadiscourse Features in Research Articles in Applied Linguistics Based on Hyland’s Classification. Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 2(1), 35- 51.
Hasbullah, N, Yamin, A. and Rahmat, N. (2021). Surviving mentally throughout Covid-19: A metadiscourse analysis of a personal blog, European Journal of Education Studies, Vol. 8 (2)
Ho, V.(2018). Using metadiscourse in making persuasive attempts through workplace request emails https://authors.elsevier.com/a/1XLUa1L-nh7sjt. Journal of Pragmatics. 134. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.06.015.
Huang, J., Xiao, W. & Wang, Y. (2023). Use of metadiscourse for identity construction in tourist city publicity: A comparative study of Chinese and Australian social media discourse, Heliyon, Vol. 9, Issue 12,
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse. Discourse Studies, 7, 173-192
Kopple, V. (1985). Some Explanatory Discourse on Metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36, 82-93.
Khokhar, S., Memon, D. & Siddique, K. (2016) Exploring Role of Language in Constructing Individual Identities: A Case Study of Sindh, Pakistan. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 6(3), 234-241.
Liu, S., & Zhang, J. (2021). Using Metadiscourse to Enhance Persuasiveness in Corporate Press Releases: A Corpus-Based Study. SAGE Open, 11(3). Taylor, Stephanie (2015). Identity Construction. In: Tracy, Karen ed. International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction. Wiley-ICA International Encyclopedias of Communication. Hoboken New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, pp. 1–9.
Lythara,V.(2016) Language and ethnic Identity. In S. Preece (e.d.) Routledge Handbook of Language and Identity. Oxon; Routledge. 131-1453.
Mahmood, I. & Kasim, Z. (2019). Interpersonal Metadiscursive Features in Contemporary Islamic Friday Sermon. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 25(1): 85 – 99
Mostafavi, M. & Tajalli, G. (2012). Metadiscoursal Markers in Medical and Literary Texts. International Journal of English Linguistics. 2(3). 64.
Sadeghi, K. & Esmaili, S. (2012). Frequency of Textual Metadiscourse Resources (MTRs) in Two Original and Simplified Novels. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 3(4). 647- 652.
Shiholo, M. (2024). Language Ideologies and Identity Construction in Immigrant Communities. European Journal of Linguistics, 3(2), pp 29 – 43.
Thompson, S. E. (2003). Text-Structuring Metadiscourse, Intonation and the Signalling of Organization in Academic Lectures”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2(1). 5–20.
Yipei, N., & Lingling, L. (2013). Investigating the Interpersonal and Textual Meanings of Steve Jobs Stanford Speech in Terms of Hyland’s Metadiscourse Theory. International Journal of Language and Linguistics. 1(4). 90–96.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bukola Alfred
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- Their co-authors authorize them to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish in the Journal of Linguistics, Culture, and Communication agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
Journal of Linguistics, Culture, and Communication use a variety of waivers and licenses that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
- Creative Commons CC-Zero Waiver, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1-0/
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.
.jpg)
