A Comparative Analysis of Power Strategies Used by Voldemort and Grindelwald Over Their Followers Through Foucault’s Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61320/jolcc.v3i2.513-541Keywords:
Harry Potter, Fantastic Beast, Foucault, Power StrategiesAbstract
Power in the Wizarding World is never static; it seduces, coerces, and eventually collapses. This article examines the contrasting strategies of Lord Voldemort and Gellert Grindelwald in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1 and 2 and Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald and The Secrets of Dumbledore through Michel Foucault’s framework of sovereign power, disciplinary power, biopower, governmentality, and resistance. Voldemort governs through terror and spectacle, enforcing obedience while fostering silent rebellion. Grindelwald, in contrast, wields ideology and charisma to secure loyalty, until coercion exposes the fragility of his control. As Foucault posits, power is relational and fluid, destined to provoke resistance. Beyond fantasy, these narratives reflect enduring truths about authority, its seductive nature, and its inevitable unravelling.
References
Ajie, P., Habsari, S. K., & Ardianto, D. T. (2023). Foucault’s Docile Bodies Perspective: The Figure of Seniwati’s Feminism in the Wido Documentary Film. Humanus: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Humaniora, 22(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.24036/humanus.v22i2.121761
Dhillon, B. S., & Sharma, D. (2024). Dystopian Futures and Posthuman Realities: Biopolitics in Lauren Beukes’s Moxyland. Journal of Literary Studies, 40. https://doi.org/10.25159/1753-5387/16017
Faiz, M., Rahman, A., Saif, A., Nazeer, S., & Scholar, M. P. (2025). International Journal of Social Science Archives Foucault’s Bio-Power of State: A Comparative Analysis between Brave New World and the Real Capitalist World. International Journal of Social Science Archives |, 7(3), 344–352. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387823007
Farner, G. (2014). Literary Fiction: The Ways We Read Narrative Literature (1st ed.). Bloomsbury Collection. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781628926996
Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.; Vol. 1). Pantehon Books.
Hajigholam, M., & Mohammadi, N. (2018). A Foucauldian Analysis of Power Distribution in David Mamet’s Faustus. Journal of Language Horizons, Alzahra University, 2(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.22051/lghor.2018.20204.1080
Hussain, B., Raza, J., & Aminullah. (2016). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PUNISHMENT AND POWER: MICHEL FOUCAULT PERSPECTIVE. EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD), 1(1), 15–20. www.eprajournals.com
Ismael, H., & Saleh, H. (2023). The discursive strategies of power and female resistance in Margret Atwood’s the handmaid’s tale: a Foucauldian reading. Humanities Journal of University of Zakho, 11(3), 555–561. https://doi.org/10.26436/hjuoz.2023.11.3.1096
Kaziliūnaitė, A. (2020). Foucault panopticism and self-surveillance: from individuals to dividuals. Problemos, 97, 36–47. https://doi.org/10.15388/Problemos.97.3
Khan, J., & Rasool, S. (2024). Imagining Frontier Governmentality: Riaz Hassan’s The Unchosen as a Janus-Faced Borderscape. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences Review, 3(4).
Maiza, K. (2024). Power and Resistance in Dystopian Literature: A Foucauldian Reading of Brave New World and The Handmaid’s Tale.
Munir, H., & Shahi, Z. (2024). Postcolonial Identity and Discourse: Foucauldian Analysis of Shamsie’s A God in Every Stone. VFAST Transactions on Education and Social Sciences, 12(2), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.21015/vtess.v12i2.1707
Munir, T., & Liaqat, Q. (2024). Power, Patriarchy and the Post-Human Subject: A Foucauldian Discourse Analysis of Han Kang’s The Vegetarian. Sydney Open Journal, 34, 99–110. https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/LA/article/view/20760
Mutiara, F. (2015). Totalitarianism versus Democracy in The Hunger Games Trilogy: Foucauldian Discourse and Power Relations. Vivid Journal, 4(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25077/vj.4.1.%25p.2015
Paris, Y. (2021). POWER RELATIONS AND THE INEVITABLE: THE CINEMA OF MIKLÓS JANCSÓ FROM A FOUCAULDIAN PERSPECTIVE. Brolly. Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1), 2021. https://journals.lapub.co.uk/index.php/brolly/article/view/1830
Rakhmatullaeva, K. (2025). THE EVOLUTION OF DYSTOPIAN NARRATIVES: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF POWER STRUCTURES IN BRADBURY’S FAHRENHEIT 451 AND CONTEMPORARY DYSTOPIAN FICTION. Scientific Journal Universum: Philology and Art Criticism, 131(5), 58–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32743/UniPhil.2025.131.5.20048
Robina, R., & Keerthana M. (2025). Divulging Biopower Through Dystopian Novels. Ars & Humanitas, 19(1), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.4312/ars.19.1.239-255
Vakili, H. (2024). Themes of the Foucauldian Notion of Resisting Power in Hilary Mantel’s Wolf Hall. 19th International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture and History Studies, 1–6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381291040
Wang, Q. (2024). Discipline and Resistance—A Foucauldian Approach to Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street. Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science, 8(4), 830–834. https://doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2024.04.002
Zaheer, F., Ali, Z., & Baig, D. (2025). Mechanisms of Algorithmic Governmentality, State-Controlled Consciousness, and Systemic Conditioning: A Techno Authoritarian Analysis of Brave New World. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 14(2), 1550–1562. https://doi.org/10.62345/jads.2025.14.2.120
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bellinzha Graine Nurshifa, Devi Hellystia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- Their co-authors authorize them to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish in the Journal of Linguistics, Culture, and Communication agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
Licensing for Data Publication
Journal of Linguistics, Culture, and Communication use a variety of waivers and licenses that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:
- Open Data Commons Attribution License, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/ (default)
- Creative Commons CC-Zero Waiver, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
- Open Data Commons Public Domain Dedication and Licence, http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1-0/
Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.
.jpg)
